to BAM or not to BAM? 🤔💀
here's the:
✅Good
apps control Tx order (ACE) makes Solana DEXs competitive (tighter spreads)
❌BAD
validators accept Tx *ONLY* from BAM
no longer accept Tx from Solana network
👹Ugly
Jito gatekeep ACE "plugins"
1/6
✅Good - ACE is super valuable!
Solana must compete with single-sequencers, eg HL which put makers Tx before takers
some (@trentdotsol, Michael from FD) think "increasing tps solves this"
but I'm with @MaxResnick1 - Solana must compete TODAY
/2
❌BAD - for BAM to work ALL Tx must go thru it
validators will stop including Tx they see directly from the Solana network
BAM decides the order & sends Tx in-order to be executed by the validator.
so why do we even need decentralized validators?🤷♂️
rubberstamps ftw! /s
/3
👹Ugly - Jito needs to gatekeep plugins
if they don't
- searcher adds plugin that puts his Tx first
- all BAM nodes run it
this means new apps cannot quietly & permissionlessly experiment - they need Jito to let them
/4
can we do better? YES
- leader decides ordering
- apps permissionless create prio-accounts
(eg jup_prio1_xxx, jup_prio2_xxx)
- protocol revert Tx w/o right read-lock right prio-account
why validators follow this order?
*apps* pool user fees, pay validators, ban rouges
/5
is there nuance here?
you bet!
but my 3 main takeaways are:
1️⃣ ACE is super valuable
2️⃣strong disagree Solana should outsource *ALL* Tx ordering to another protocol
3️⃣Solana can achieve ACE w/o this "outsourcing"
and we're building it 😎
6/6
@KultureElectric @jito_sol @buffalu__ @brian_smith_0 btw - not sure why @michaelh_laine is totally ok with this strategy
he gave me hell for Paladin GH being invite-only initially
I expect him to hold Jito to the same standard (BAM decides *all* Tx included by leaders, Paladin just slightly affected it)
7.89 K
0
El contenido al que estás accediendo se ofrece por terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es autor de la información y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido solo se proporciona con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo enlazado para más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. Los holdings de activos digitales, incluidos stablecoins y NFT, suponen un alto nivel de riesgo y pueden fluctuar mucho. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti según tu situación financiera.